Current:Home > NewsThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -消息
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Ethermac View
Date:2025-04-07 05:54:33
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Millie Bobby Brown Shares Sweet Glimpse Into Married Life With Jake Bongiovi
- US Homeland Security halts immigration permits from 4 countries amid concern about sponsorship fraud
- Tyreek Hill of Miami Dolphins named No. 1 in 'Top 100 Players of 2024' countdown
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Gleyber Torres benched by Yankees' manager Aaron Boone for lack of hustle
- U.S. defense secretary rejects plea deal for 9/11 mastermind, puts death penalty back on table
- WWE SummerSlam 2024: Time, how to watch, match card and more
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Screw the monarchy: Why 'House of the Dragon' should take this revolutionary twist
Ranking
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Favre challenges a judge’s order that blocked his lead attorney in Mississippi welfare lawsuit
- Katie Ledecky swims into history with 800 freestyle victory at the Paris Olympics
- Netherlands' Femke Bol steals 4x400 mixed relay win from Team USA in Paris Olympics
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Aerosmith retires from touring permanently due to Steven Tyler injury: Read full statement
- 2024 Olympics: Gymnast Stephen Nedoroscik win Bronze in Pommel Horse Final
- In a win for Mexico, US will expand areas for migrants to apply online for entry at southern border
Recommendation
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Gleyber Torres benched by Yankees' manager Aaron Boone for lack of hustle
Rejuvenated Steelers QB Russell Wilson still faces challenges on path to redemption
Are we in a recession? The Sahm rule explained
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Why Simone Biles is leaving the door open to compete at 2028 Olympics: 'Never say never'
Ticketmaster posts additional Eras Tour show in Toronto, quickly takes it down
Parties in lawsuits seeking damages for Maui fires reach $4B global settlement, court filings say