Current:Home > InvestJudge in Trump’s hush money case clarifies gag order doesn’t prevent ex-president from testifying -消息
Judge in Trump’s hush money case clarifies gag order doesn’t prevent ex-president from testifying
View
Date:2025-04-17 10:26:37
The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush money trial has clarified that the gag order pertaining to the former president doesn’t prohibit him from testifying on his own behalf.
Judge Juan M. Merchan started the trial day Friday by making that clarification, apparently responding to comments the Republican former president made after court the day before.
“The order restricting extrajudicial statements does not prevent you from testifying in any way,” Merchan said in court in New York, adding that the order does not limit what Trump says on the witness stand.
The judge’s comments came after Trump’s statement to reporters Thursday that he was “not allowed to testify” due to the gag order, an apparent reversal of Trump’s earlier vow that he would “absolutely” take the witness stand. Criminal defendants have a constitutional right to take the stand and cannot be forced to incriminate themselves.
Merchan directed his comments to Trump and his lawyers, saying it had come to his attention that there may have been a “misunderstanding” regarding the order.
Ahead of walking into court on Friday, Trump clarified his earlier comments, saying that the gag order does not stop him from testifying in the case but instead stops him from “talking about people and responding when they say things about me.”
The gag order — which bars Trump from commenting publicly about witnesses, prosecutors, court staff and jurors but does not pertain to Merchan or Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg — also came up as Trump briefly returned to the campaign trail earlier this week in Michigan and Wisconsin.
On Wednesday, Trump called Merchan “crooked” for holding him in contempt of court and imposing a a $9,000 fine for making public statements from his Truth Social account about people connected to the criminal case.
“There is no crime. I have a crooked judge. He’s a totally conflicted judge,” Trump told supporters at an event in Waukesha, Wisconsin, claiming again that this and other cases against him are led by the White House to undermine his 2024 campaign to win back the presidency.
Trump insists he is merely exercising his free speech rights, but the offending posts from his Truth Social account and campaign website were taken down. He has said he plans to testify at his trial.
If Trump continued to violate his orders, Merchan said, he would “impose an incarceratory punishment.” In issuing the original gag order in March, Merchan cited Trump’s history of “threatening, inflammatory, denigrating” remarks about people involved in his legal cases.
Prosecutors want to directly tie Trump to payments that were made to silence women with damaging claims about him before the 2016 presidential election.
Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying internal Trump Organization business records but denies any wrongdoing. The charges stem from things like invoices and checks that were deemed legal expenses in Trump Organization records when prosecutors say they were really reimbursements to his attorney and fixer Michael Cohen for a $130,000 hush money payment to porn performer Stormy Daniels.
___
Meg Kinnard can be reached at http://twitter.com/MegKinnardAP
___
Kinnard reported from Columbia, S.C. Michelle L. Price and Michael R. Sisak contributed from New York.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Sydney Sweeney Makes Euphoric Appearance With Fiancé Jonathan Davino in Cannes
- Recovery high schools help kids heal from an addiction and build a future
- The improbable fame of a hijab-wearing teen rapper from a poor neighborhood in Mumbai
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Man arrested after allegedly throwing phone at Bebe Rexha during concert
- U.S. Soldiers Falling Ill, Dying in the Heat as Climate Warms
- How a Contrarian Scientist Helped Trump’s EPA Defy Mainstream Science
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Kim Kardashian Admits She Cries Herself to Sleep Amid Challenging Parenting Journey
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Seiichi Morimura, 'The Devil's Gluttony' author, dies at 90 after pneumonia case
- 13 years after bariatric surgery, a 27-year-old says it changed her life
- California restaurant used fake priest to get workers to confess sins, feds say
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Pipeline Payday: How Builders Win Big, Whether More Gas Is Needed or Not
- Flood Risks from All Sides: Barry’s Triple Whammy in Louisiana
- Sarah Jessica Parker Shares Sweet Tribute to Matthew Broderick for Their 26th Anniversary
Recommendation
Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
Ranchers Fight Keystone XL Pipeline by Building Solar Panels in Its Path
Sherri Shepherd tributes 'The View' co-creator Bill Geddie: 'He absolutely changed my life'
Judge's ruling undercuts U.S. health law's preventive care
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
1 dead, at least 22 wounded in mass shooting at Juneteenth celebration in Illinois
How Massachusetts v. EPA Forced the U.S. Government to Take On Climate Change
In the Midst of the Coronavirus, California Weighs Diesel Regulations