Current:Home > MarketsCalifornia bill to have humans drivers ride in autonomous trucks is vetoed by governor -消息
California bill to have humans drivers ride in autonomous trucks is vetoed by governor
View
Date:2025-04-13 08:10:04
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill to require human drivers on board self-driving trucks, a measure that union leaders and truck drivers said would save hundreds of thousands of jobs in the state.
The legislation vetoed Friday night would have banned self-driving trucks weighing more than 10,000 pounds (4,536 kilograms) — ranging from UPS delivery vans to massive big rigs — from operating on public roads unless a human driver is on board.
Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, head of the California Labor Federation, said driverless trucks are dangerous and called Newsom’s veto shocking. She estimates that removing drivers would cost a quarter million jobs in the state.
“We will not sit by as bureaucrats side with tech companies, trading our safety and jobs for increased corporate profits. We will continue to fight to make sure that robots do not replace human drivers and that technology is not used to destroy good jobs,” Fletcher said in a statement late Friday.
In a statement announcing that he would not sign the bill, the Democratic governor said additional regulation of autonomous trucks was unnecessary because existing laws are sufficient.
Newsom pointed to 2012 legislation that allows the state Department of Motor Vehicles to work with the California Highway Patrol, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration “and others with relevant expertise to determine the regulations necessary for the safe operation of autonomous vehicles on public roads.”
Opponents of the bill argued self-driving cars that are already on the roads haven’t caused many serious accidents compared to cars driven by people. Businesses say self-driving trucks would help them transport products more efficiently.
Union leaders and drivers said the bill would have helped address concerns about safety and losing truck driving jobs to automation in the future.
The bill coasted through the Legislature with few lawmakers voting against it. It’s part of ongoing debates about the potential risks of self-driving vehicles and how workforces adapt to a new era as companies deploy technologies to do work traditionally done by humans.
Newsom, who typically enjoys strong support from labor, faced some pressure from within his administration not to sign it. His administration’s Office of Business and Economic Development says it would push companies making self-driving technologies to move out-of-state.
The veto comes as the debate over the future of autonomous vehicles heats up. In San Francisco, two robotaxi companies got approval last month from state regulators to operate in the city at all hours.
Last Tuesday in Sacramento, hundreds of truck drivers, union leaders and other supporters of the bill rallied at the state Capitol. Drivers chanted “sign that bill” as semi-trucks lined a street in front of the Capitol. There are about 200,000 commercial truck drivers in California, according to Teamsters officials.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- FDA approves Alzheimer's drug that appears to modestly slow disease
- We asked, you answered: More global buzzwords for 2023, from precariat to solastalgia
- Why Olivia Wilde Wore a White Wedding Dress to Colton Underwood and Jordan C. Brown's Nuptials
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- 2017’s Extreme Heat, Flooding Carried Clear Fingerprints of Climate Change
- Ultra rare and endangered sperm whale pod spotted off California coast in once a year opportunity
- The FDA proposes new targets to limit lead in baby food
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- As car thefts spike, many thieves slip through U.S. border unchecked
Ranking
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Many ERs offer minimal care for miscarriage. One group wants that to change
- On 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Kamala Harris urges federal abortion protections
- You'll Burn for Jonathan Bailey in This First Look at Him on the Wicked Set With Ariana Grande
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Ariana Madix Reveals the Shocking First Time She Learned Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss Had Sex
- Pennsylvania Battery Plant Cashes In on $3 Billion Micro-Hybrid Vehicle Market
- A newborn was surrendered to Florida's only safe haven baby box. Here's how they work
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Paul Ryan: Trump's baggage makes him unelectable, indictment goes beyond petty politics
The EPA Once Said Fracking Did Not Cause Widespread Water Contamination. Not Anymore
Social isolation linked to an increased risk of dementia, new study finds
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
What should you wear to run in the cold? Build an outfit with this paper doll
U.S. Electric Car Revolution to Go Forward, With or Without Congress
Trump Moves to Limit Environmental Reviews, Erase Climate Change from NEPA Considerations